This article is a sample from the DealForma Annual Deal Trends Report provided to database subscribers. Data for this analysis was compiled using the DealForma biopharma deals database. We applied initial filters for mergers and acquisitions, therapeutic areas, asset stages at M&A, and deal payment terms. From there, we exported the data to Excel and used pivot tables and charts to do the rest. All data are based on publicly disclosed figures. We invite you to answer interesting questions on biopharma business development and licensing using our data and carefully curated profiles on deals, pipelines, companies, funding, and business executives by visiting dealforma.com to schedule your personalized demo.
Life sciences M&A was closely watched in 2019, especially after starting off the year with Bristol-Myers Squibb’s $74 billion buyout of Celgene. Industry watchers were not disappointed as the year closed with 229 announced deals valued at $241 billion, capping one of the best years for life sciences M&A activity over the past 12 years. A second megadeal, AbbVie’s $63 billion takeout of Allergan in June, bolstered the numbers, but it was Big Pharma’s continued drive to acquire biotech innovation that drove real excitement in the space.
These figures are available for download below.
This was evidenced very early in the year as Roche announced it would pay $4.3 billion for Spark Therapeutics, making a strong foray into gene therapies, and Eli Lilly bought Loxo Oncology for $8 billion.
We looked at DealForma’s extensive database to see how 2019 shaped up in more detail. The total M&A deal value of biopharma therapeutics and platforms, diagnostics, and medtech companies rose 36 percent over 2018 while deal volume dropped 19 percent from the previous year. Most of the value was in cash and equity upfront with only 6 percent contingent on milestones.
Average upfront cash and equity of 2019 M&A deals at $2.3 billion was almost double the average upfront cash and equity of 2018 M&A deals at $1.3 billion. This is due in large part to the two megadeals, whereas median upfront cash and equity rose 22 percent in 2019 to $180 million and was bolstered by a spate of mid-size high value deals in the fourth quarter of 2019.
Indeed, at the start of the fourth quarter of 2019, biotech was in the doldrums, but was lifted by a spate of deals that emphasized biotech’s promising new technologies and came at premiums often exceeding 100 percent:
|Acquirer||Target||Technology||Stage at Acquisition||Total Deal Value ($M)||1-Day Share Price Premium (%)|
|Sanofi||Synthorx||Cell therapy / Immunotherapy||Phase I||2500||172%|
|UCB||Ra Pharmaceuticals||Small molecule / Autoimmune||Phase III||2100||112%|
|Astellas||Audentes Therapeutics||Gene therapy||Phase I||3000||110%|
|Merck||ArQule||Small molecule / Cancer||Phase III||2700||107%|
|Novartis||The Medicines Company||RNA therapies||Phase III||9700||85%|
Want data for your analysis? Want us to do it? Subscribers get both.
Schedule your demo of the DealForma database to see how we help you get better reports done faster.
Specifically for Biotech, Pharma, Device, and Diagnostics
Private Biopharma M&A
Of the 25 deals valued at $1 billion and above, only three were for private biotech companies: Merck’s acquisition of Peloton Therapeutics, a mid-stage developer of small molecules targeting renal cancer for $1.05 billion in upfront cash and another $1.15 billion dependent on the achievement of specific milestones; Roche’s acquisition of Promedior, a mid-stage developer of small molecule pulmonary therapies, for $1 billion in upfront cash and up to $390 million in potential milestones; and Ipsen’s acquisition of rare disease play Clementia Pharmaceuticals for $1.04 billion in upfront cash and another $263 million in potential milestones.
But private biopharmaceutical companies continue to make up about 30 percent of all M&A transactions, on par with contract development, manufacturing, and services companies.
In 2019, 64 private biotech companies were acquired for a total deal value of $14.4 billion, $5.8 billion upfront and $8.6 billion in contingent payments, an almost 22 percent drop from the 82 private biotech acquisitions in 2018. Still it should be noted that median M&A upfront for these companies rose 48 percent to $62 million from $42 million in 2018.
Small and Mid-Cap Biopharma M&A
Mid Cap biotech companies continue to account for only a handful of deals, and while the number of small cap biotech targets has grown, the total deal value of small and mid-cap biopharma M&A dropped 63 percent to $42.7 billion in 2019 compared to $113.9 billion in 2018. Again the median upfront cash rose 62 percent to $985 million in 2019 compared to $607 million in 2018.
Biopharma M&A in 2020?
How does this bode for M&A activity in 2020? Though the biotech industry’s original members lost Celgene in 2019, the remaining class of Big Biotechs — Amgen, Biogen, Gilead Sciences, along with Regeneron and Vertex — have weathered the ups and downs of drug development and remain strong. And there is a rising class of mid- to large-cap companies that could be takeover targets: Alnylam, Sarepta, BioMarin, to name a few. Positive data from trials of emerging gene therapies, RNAi therapies, and cell therapies bode well for a strong year for the industry as years of research are bearing fruit with the advent of medicines that have the potential to improve patients’ lives and cure disease.
Marie Daghlian is a freelance writer and editor who reports on the business of biotechnology and healthcare technologies. She also covers the industry for Big4Bio, a daily newsletter focused on the four major biotech centers in the United States.
More from the DealForma Blog
Over the last three years, there have been eight M&A deals for companies developing advanced first generation and next gen cancer cell therapies. Six of them have been completed to date.
We looked at 10 years of gene therapy deals, M&A, venture funding, and academic partnerships for an article by John Carroll at Endpoints News.
Biotech reverse mergers have been an alternate way for private biotechnology companies to gain a public listing. Here’s a quick table of over 10 years of deals.
2019 biopharma dealmaking started with a bang as the first quarter saw global biotech and pharma partnering deal values hit $38 billion in 282 deals.
Celgene was among the top investors in cancer biotech companies. This is a look at the top 10 since 2010.
Life Sciences M&A started with a bang in 2019 with one of the biggest deals to date – Bristol-Myers Squibb will acquire Celgene for $74 billion. We mined DealForma’s extensive database for historical M&A trends in biopharma, medical devices, and diagnostics to get an idea of what might lie ahead in 2019.
Innovative biotech companies are in a stronger position today as far as the value of their assets. We look at oncology deal payments by stage at signing.
Global biotechnology venture investment topped $11.8 billion in 258 financing rounds in the first 10 months of 2018. Who are the top biotech venture investors, where are they investing their money, and what are they investing in?
Location, Location, Location: Real estate costs a lot in the three largest biotech hubs, but it’s a charm for raising capital. Biotech companies raised $37.4 billion globally in 1027 rounds of venture financing over the past four years from 2015 through the third quarter of 2018 and companies located in the San Francisco Bay Area, greater Boston area, and San Diego County accounted for 55 percent of the total raised and 46 percent of the financing activity.
Pharma deal upfront cash payments made for development and commercialization with biotech, device, diagnostics, and technology platform companies.
You met on Zoom. Now it's Deal Time.
With thousands of company profiles and a decade of deals specifically in biotech and pharma, you'll take the guesswork out of deal comps. Schedule your customized demo to see how DealForma helps you win that term sheet with better data.
DealForma is the biopharma database providing you comprehensive information and analyst support hours to help you be more confident using quality data in your business development research.
Analysis / Blog